Religion is an answer to the problem or dilemma that besets our human condition. Throughout its long history, the answer of religion has changed according to the nature of its problem.
Earliest religion was focused on the body and a need for the business of society to stay connected to the provident rhythms of nature. It was ceremonial, meticulously ritualized, and dedicated to synchronizing cultural activity with the urgencies, cycles and seasons of life. In its elaborate productions culture spends the energy that nature provides, requiring regular refreshment to continue.
The dilemma or problem, then, had to do with the fact that culture is not a renewable resource. Despite its impressive production output, societies continue to depend on the life energy and raw materials of the planetary environment. Living off the land and taking the life of other animals for food made our earliest ancestors keenly aware of the need to respect this balance, cooperate with nature, and repay a portion by ritual offerings and sacrifices.
In time, the focus shifted to more socially unique concerns like security, membership, identity and purpose. Thus arose a religion of the ego. If life energy is drawn up from the animal nature of the body (and from the greater “mother nature” of our planet), then ego is where a large amount of this energy is expended. Pursuits of security and recognition, property and status, quickly exhaust themselves. They are not replenishing cycles but more like straight lines losing strength and trailing off in the hopeful pursuit of “enough.”
As the personality is chronically stressed by discontentment, eventually the ego fastened on a marvelous fantasy – that one day a clean escape would be made, leaving behind the mortal burden of the body and accomplishing at last a perfect state of everlasting security. What we can call “ego religion” is focused on artificial life, not natural life; on a life that is unnaturally extended along a straight line that never ends. Its fantasy is of a disembodied and entirely metaphysical existence, reunited with a “heavenly father” after a painful and frustrating sojourn with “mother nature.”
Ego religion tends to be denominational (heavily invested in the tribe and its tradition), proselytic (focused on conversion and recruiting members), moralistic (enforcing rules on how one should live), and gnostic (upholding and defending certain doctrines as necessary to salvation). As a program for resource management, social cohesion, and mind control it can’t be beat. While it demonstrates little sacred concern for nature and the body, vestiges of earlier (nature) religion persist in its holy days (holidays) coinciding with solstices, moon phases, and seasonal transitions.
What raises the concern of many today is not so much that ego religion is all those things just mentioned, but that it pushes an agenda of escape, disassociation from the body and nature, and departing to a better place. How long can it go on, where we use up the resources of one location and abandon it for the next? How much longer can we continue to generate stress – perhaps the one renewable resource of culture – and multiply the diseases of body and mind?
How long, really, can we live as “souls inside bodies,” waiting in patient hope or hastening the day when we shall be set free from this prison house and rewarded in heaven for being good and getting it right?
So that is the problem of our human condition today. The fall-out of this divided life of ours – suppressing, craving, consuming, wasting and leaving – makes coming back not only less and less appealing, but over time less and less possible. The irony is that, while religion might offer an answer to this problem, religion is itself a major cause of the problem. The vision of a scorched and lifeless landscape contained in some of its apocalyptic myths is slowly (but less slowly) becoming our self-fulfilling prophecy.
If religion is to offer an answer to the dilemma of our human condition, then it will be a call to return. Interestingly enough, this is the literal meaning of the familiar word “repent.” In this case, it’s a call to return to what we have been trying so hard to leave behind – the earth, nature, our bodies, and the burden of mortality.
This is what I am calling “soulful religion,” which is not a religion about immortality, metaphysics and the afterlife, but rather of incarnational living, creative community, human fulfillment and planetary well-being.
In fact, it seems to me that this has been The Way of Salvation from the very beginning. During the long winding diversion into metaphysics, escapism and redemptive violence, a few brave lights did emerge from time to time. They spoke of life HERE, love NOW, and of liberty beyond the confines of tribe, tradition and orthodoxy. It didn’t go well for many of them.
Ironically (again) the very crusaders who persecuted and stamped out these light-bringers later memorialized and venerated them in their churches. But not until the story could be rewritten and the savior remade into a drop-in rescuer, a god in disguise, or a scapegoat for sin. (Jesus was made into all three.) As Bible scholarship is able to do its business outside of denominational publishing houses and unmotivated by religious convictions, the emerging picture of the “historical Jesus” is looking less and less like the Savior of Christendom.
In a time when many are asking about truth in religion and the way of salvation, we need to consider this possibility. It’s not that one religion is true while the others are not; or that all religions are true in their own way; or that religion itself is nothing but superstition and lies.
Rather, the religions are like squiggly lines moving across history, each one a meandering path through the landscape and time zones of our collective human experience. Most of the time, a given religion is busy working out its metaphysics, redefining its membership, getting back to fundamentals, or accommodating itself to the larger culture.But once in a while, the squiggle takes a turn and comes very close to the invisible guideline of fulfillment, wholeness, well-being and genuine community – to the greater wisdom and higher ideal of our own human nature. The light goes on, fear drops away, love opens out, and peace settles in. For this brief moment, as it aligns itself to The Way, a religion can be said to be true.
And in the next moment, as this truth gets defined, professed, and defended as the “only way” to god or heaven or life everlasting, it just as quickly veers away and falls off course. In some eras of history – and maybe we’re in one now – it’s possible that all religions are squiggling off in the distance, while just a few individuals around this whole planet – and maybe you’re one of them – are waking up and stepping quietly on The Way.
Interesting stuff. ‘Pursuit of enough’. Greatness in defining our current state. What else is there to do when you live in a society that rewards the collection of ‘things’? ‘Love’, that thing that has no capital value, quickly and easily takes second, third, sixteenth place next to my trips, cars and portfolio. Who has time for Love when Goldman-Sachs has my heart?
Getting out of ‘the way’ of this monster and replacing it with ‘the way’ of a higher version of truth — fulfillment, wholeness, well being and genuine community — is a pain in the ass and requires deliberateness….something not taught in graduate school. Bummer. So, we have to pursue this ideal on our own….sometimes alone, sometimes with others we find on the same path, sometimes intoxicated or high. And, as you note below, a higher version of truth will, in a flash of legalism and ‘rightness’, become the next thing we truth seekers disdain and call an oppressive approach to ‘the way’.
So, let’s all get naked, stay naked and avoid any tie to thought structure and simply keep our focus on our nakedness…a constant reminder that what we ‘have’ is ugly, saggy and short…well, for some…and that who we ARE is deep inside and that we are Loved in spite of what we show the world. Adam and Eve-ish. I am now going to get dressed.
Sent from my iPad
>
Thanks, Rex. I’m not sure about the “naked” part, but let’s stay spiritually awake and live with intention. The great thing is, more and more people are opening up to life in this honest and authentic way. Sometimes we need to go find them; sometimes they find us.
Some of this information you have given us in our meets at Wisdom Circle, so seeing this written out is very helpful, and I agree with the concept. Many of this world’s inhabitants have lost touch with their family, with community, with nature, and with the world. Many of these same people, instead of looking at what’s around them to make their community better, to bring a bit of relief to another human, they are many times “consumed” with the ideal of having more things. This never ceases to amaze me, when I hear others talk about their new car, with the same importance of having a new baby, or grand child, for instance.
Unlike Rex, it really takes more work for me to place the “things” in my life on a higher level than the people in my life. When purchasing a large ticket item, be it a car, a washing machine. computer, etc, it is not decided quickly but researched very well, which may take days or weeks.
There was time when I first got married to my former husband, that keeping up with friends and family became a buying competition. It’s not that way now, with me, I have learned that way of living lacks substance and grounding. When socializing with my tribe, it seems an easy thing for me to care about those around me, much easier than buying a car. When taking a walk, visiting a sick friend, or helping a friend move, those are the activities that are easy for me.
But everyday events sometime call for me to have to make a living once in awhile, but no one can force me to spend my money, or time on something I don’t want. I prefer being conscience of the fact that anything I consume from nature, and natural resources might eventually affect my grandchildren and their children in the future. I have a limited life, and no second chances for me or anyone else. I like to think I treat the earth and its resources as a precious, limited asset. I’m not living in a cave, but I do try to be considerate of future generations, in the way I live, and the community causes I take up. That’s why it is difficult for me when I hear people disregard the limitations of our planet. It affects us all, but then, if I believed that I would have everlasting life, somewhere floating in the “clouds”, I might agree with them.
I appreciate and respect your honest desire to live responsibly, Laurieann. It’s not easy, for sure – and less so as our lifestyle becomes increasingly dependent on technology that uses natural resources we don’t directly see. It takes some effort to research what our “footprint” actually is, and most of us are either too busy or don’t want the guilt. Far easier to use what we “need” and leave the mess for those behind us.
Thanks for your reply!
An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a coworker who had been doing a little research
on this. And he in fact ordered me lunch because I discovered
it for him… lol. So let me reword this…. Thank
YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending the time to talk about this topic here on your
web site.
I’m glad you and your friend found the post helpful! Thanks for reading … and sharing!